Thus if you configured them the same way and if you have the same services running, you probably won’t experience a speed difference. As to running Windows Server 2008 as a workstation, I’ve read several articles about this topic and some say it is a myth that Server2008 is faster than Vista SP1. However, I think Vista’s Start Search prompt is good enough for the average end user. This is how it should be with an advanced operating system. And you are right, Vista is slower than XP. I also don’t have problems launching Office apps via the Start Search prompt. The fastest way I know to change the network settings is to right click on Network in the Start Menu and then navigate to Properties. I also didn’t like the new Network Configuration Center in the beginning, but I now like it better than under XP. I often had this problem under XP, but never under Vista. It is funny somehow that you complain that Explorer keeps forgetting your folder settings. You can move files in Vista the same way you did in XP. Nev, hmm what do you mean with “move to function”. Only then will you realize how clumsy XP’s old-fashioned interface really is. The best way to learn to value the new user interface is to logon to an XP machine after working with Vista for a couple of months. But every time I pumped them for more details, it became clear that they simply didn’t want to invest time to find out how they could benefit from the changes. I have met quite a few Vista opponents who have complained about the many changes in the user interface, which in their opinion seems to make no sense. The other examples he gives lead me to assume the latter. I think he gave away his secret when he let himself be carried away by using the term “foreign-looking.” Isn’t any change foreign-looking? I mean, if it looks familiar it is not really a change worth mentioning, is it? So, could it be that he belongs to those who just dislike any kind of change? Another explanation is that the he didn’t really spend much time with Vista to explore the new capabilities of its user interface. I have said that Kennedy’s judgment is revealing. If you often use the Explorer, then this will certainly speed up your work significantly. The good thing about this change is that you can also reach all other upper levels this way with only a mouse click. All you have to do is click on the name of the corresponding folder in the address bar. You can still navigate to a higher level with just a mouse click. This is very hard to understand for me because I think that this new feature of Vista’s Explorer is indeed an improvement. He misses the “up a level” button in Explorer and the new “foreign-looking” address bar doesn’t compensate for this big loss. However, I find the examples given by Kennedy to be quite revealing. The quality of user interface is to a large extent a matter of taste. The problem certainly is that it is quite difficult to find objective measures with regard to usability. The “up a level button” in Explorer is missing, the Search field shows up much too often, and the backup tool doesn’t provide enough feedback about the success of backups.Įven though Kennedy says that “the jury's still out on whether better,” it has become quite obvious that he really dislikes Vista’s user interface. Some modifications are even a change for the worse. Most modifications of the user interface were just made for the sake of change and didn’t improve usability. Many settings were moved to other places which makes it difficult for XP veterans to find their way on Vista.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |